Dialog Teologic XXIX/58 (2026)

Dialog Teologic XXIX/58 (2026)
 p., 17×24, ISSN 1453-8075, 25 lei.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53438/SQWH8546

Cumpără online de la Librăria Sapientia
Vizualizează online Dialog Teologic 58

 

 

Florin-Emilian ŢURCANU
Light between physics and theology: analogical convergence, epistemological limits, and the rationality of creation
This article examines the epistemological conditions under which light can function as a locus of dialogue between physics and theology, without concordism, reductionism, category error, or appeal to a “God of the gaps.” The guiding question concerns the methodological rules required for the two discourses to meet without one being reduced to the other. The thesis defended is that the only legitimate form of convergence is analogical and stratified: physics describes the properties, interactions, and cosmological role of light through empirico-mathematical methods, metaphysics interrogates the intelligibility of this description, and theology interprets creation in relation to the Logos and its finality — three distinct yet not isolated levels. The article draws on the author’s own interdisciplinary profile (engineering and theological formation) to propose a methodological model more precise than the simplified formula “science answers how, theology answers why,” refining it through the Thomistic rule of analogy and through four recent studies by the theologian Gabriel-Iulian Robu on the limits of conceptual language about the divine. The article discusses, as a methodological case study, the figure of the priest-physicist Georges Lemaître and formulates three serious objections to its own argument — epistemic asymmetry, the rhetorical risk of analogy, and the “God of the gaps” objection — to which it responds, concluding with three operational criteria for a responsible dialogue.

Gabriel HĂLĂNDUȚ
What kind of person does a just society need? Some Reflections Inspired by John Rawls

This article examines the early ethical thought of John Rawls through his thesis from 1942, A Brief Inquiry into the Meaning of Sin and Faith: An Interpretation Based on the Concept of Community, with particular attention to its implications for understanding the later development of his political philosophy. Written when Rawls was twenty-one and deeply engaged with Christian theology, his thesis presents an explicitly theological account of human nature, sin, faith, and community. His central claim is that the fundamental moral problem is not primarily the pursuit of the wrong object, or the satisfaction of inappropriate desires, but the distortion of personal relations and the destruction of community. Rawls distinguishes between natural and personal relations and argues that the latter constitute the proper sphere of ethical life. Sin is consequently understood as a repudiation of community, while faith represents an openness to God and to other persons through which community is restored.
This article argues that several themes already present in the young Rawls anticipate important elements of his mature philosophy: the moral significance of distinct persons, the rejection of society as a mere bargain among self-interested individuals, the priority of fair interpersonal relations over the maximization of a subjectiv good, and the importance of social institutions for sustaining relations of equality and mutual respect. At the same time, significant discontinuities must be recognized. The mature Rawls abandons the theological vocabulary of sin, grace, salvation, and divine revelation and develops a political conception of justice capable of accommodating reasonable pluralism. The article concludes by suggesting that the early thesis is valuable not because it provides a theological foundation for justice as fairness, but because it reveals an enduring anthropological concern underlying Rawls’ work: what kind of human relations and moral dispositions are necessary if a society is to become just?

Eugène DASSEN
Entendre la Parole qui sauve: Michel Henry, l’Incarnation et la Révélation chrétienne à la lumière de Dei Verbum

Michel Henry’s Paroles du Christ asks how Christ’s words can be heard as the Word of God. Reading Henry’s accounts of living speech, salvation, Incarnation and Eucharist alongside Vatican II’s Dei Verbum, this article argues that the inward efficacy of the Word cannot be theologically detached from Christ’s historical life, inspired Scripture and ecclesial reception. Jean Greisch’s objections concerning language, historical interpretation and creaturely life help delimit this Catholic reading. The study proposes a constructive dialogue rather than a doctrinal assimilation of Henry’s phenomenology.

Fabian PITRETI
Il concetto di sostanza nelle Categorie e nella Metafisica di Aristotele

This paper examines the concept of substance (ousia) in Aristotle’s Categories and Metaphysics through a critical and comparative analysis of the interpretations proposed by J. L. Ackrill and S. Menn. The study first addresses the longstanding debate concerning the status, function, and philosophical scope of the Categories, questioning whether they should be understood primarily as a logical–dialectical handbook or as an ontologically significant treatise. According to S. Menn, the Categories serve as a dialectical encheiridion, providing methodological tools for classification and argumentation without engaging in causal or metaphysical inquiry. By contrast, J. L. Ackrill maintains that the logical distinctions developed in the Categories reflect the real structure of being and thus constitute an initial sketch of Aristotle’s ontology.
The paper then focuses on the notion of substance as articulated in the Categories, especially the distinction between primary and secondary substances and the criteria that establish the priority of primary substances. It highlights how Menn interprets these criteria as purely dialectical rules for classification, while Ackrill reads them as expressing genuine ontological commitments.
Finally, the relationship between the Categories and Metaphysics is examined, showing how Aristotle moves from a non-causal, classificatory account of substance to a causal and explanatory investigation of substance in Metaphysics Ζ. The paper argues that, while significant methodological differences exist between the two works, the Metaphysics presupposes and develops the conceptual framework established in the Categories, revealing a fundamental continuity in Aristotle’s philosophical project.