The Divine Attribute of Mercy in Ioan Scotus Eriugena: Differences and Confluences with Jewish Kabbalah

This article undertakes a comparative theological and metaphysical analysis of the divine attribute of Mercy (Misericordia) as it is implicitly and explicitly understood in the Neoplatonic Christian philosophy of Ioan Scotus Eriugena and as it is systematically articulated by the Sefirah of Chesed (חסד) in Jewish Kabbalah, particularly within the Zoharic tradition. While separated by chronology, geography, and religious tradition, both Eriugena and the Kabbalists grappled with the fundamental paradox of a transcendent, unknowable God who is simultaneously an immanent, compassionate, and creative force. This study argues that Eriugena’s concept of Mercy is not a distinct, isolated attribute but is deeply embedded within his holistic vision of the divine nature (physis) as a process of creative self-manifestation, procession, and return (reditus). Mercy, for Eriugena, is the very dynamic of theophany—God’s act of creating, sustaining, and ultimately redeeming creation by becoming knowable within it. In Kabbalah, Chesed is a foundational Sefirah, the principle of unbounded love and grace, which must be balanced by Gevurah (Judgment) to ensure the stable manifestation of the cosmos. By juxtaposing Eriugena’s processional Mercy with Kabbalah’s emanational Chesed, this article illuminates profound confluences in their understanding of Mercy as the engine of creation and the promise of cosmic restoration. However, it also highlights crucial differences rooted in their respective Christological and Torah-centric frameworks, particularly concerning the means and finality of divine redemptive action. The analysis reveals a shared „grammar” of apophatic theology and emanationist metaphysics, suggesting a common heritage of Neoplatonic thought, while underscoring the unique theological syntheses achieved within Christian and Jewish mysticism.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53438/KONL7110

Dialog 57-5 Benescu

Being and Nonbeing: The Structure of the Absolute Transcendent, a Kabbalistic Perspective

This article examines the Kabbalistic view of God (the Absolute) as a dynamic interplay between Nonbeing (Ein Sof, the infinite abyss) and Being (the Sefirot, divine attributes). Using René Guénon’s metaphysics and Emmanuel Lévinas’s ethics, it argues this structure isn’t just abstract. Instead, the transcendent is experienced immanently through the ethical responsibility to other people. The divine is ultimately found in our ethical encounters.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53438/LHOI8256

Dialog 56-7 Benescu

Quando le parole diventano Credo

The presentation proposes a philosophical-theological reflection on the importance of language in general and theological language in particular as it emerges from the Nicene Creed. Starting from a series of considerations on the importance of words and language from a philosophical point of view (Plato, Aristotle, Wittgenstein, Humboldt, Paul Ricoeur, Umberto Eco), we will then proceed to concretize these considerations by choosing three concepts: the concept of birth/génitum; substance-consubstantial and de begotten/procédi. The effort and genius of the holy fathers in creating theological concepts and language will thus be highlighted. We will conclude with a reflection on current language in theology.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53438/DLSF9952

Dialog 56-2 Pitreți

The Divine Attribute of Transcendence in Schopenhauer’s Work

This article undertakes an extensive examination of the concept of transcendence within the philosophical framework of Arthur Schopenhauer. While Schopenhauer is renowned for his immanent metaphysics, which posits the world as the self-objectification of a blind, striving Will, this paper argues that his system contains a unique and profound form of “immanent transcendence”. The analysis begins by establishing Schopenhauer’s explicit and trenchant critique of traditional, theistic notions of a transcendent Creator-God, which he dismisses as “popular metaphysics” incompatible with his Kantian- inspired epistemology. The core of the article then pivots to explore the three primary pathways through which Schopenhauer offers an escape, or a transcendence, from the suffering inherent in the phenomenal world governed by the Will and the principium individuationis. These pathways are: (1) aesthetic contemplation, where the subject becomes a “pure, will-less subject of knowledge,” momentarily transcending individuality to grasp the eternal Platonic Ideas; (2) ethical action rooted in compassion (Mitleid), which pierces the “veil of Maya” to recognize the shared suffering and fundamental unity of all beings; and (3) asceticism, the ultimate denial of the Will-to-live, which represents the final and most complete form of self-transcendence, leading to a state of nothingness or Nirvana. By analyzing these avenues, the article demonstrates that Schopenhauer does not merely negate transcendence but rather re-conceptualizes it, shifting its locus from an external, divine realm to an internal, experiential liberation from the deterministic chains of the Will. This secularized soteriology provides a powerful, albeit pessimistic, response to the fundamental human need to find meaning and relief from the existential condition.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53438/WYIH7179

Dialog 55-10 Benescu

La reciprocità come principio costitutivo della volontà:la prospettiva fenomenologica dell’opera Il volontario e l’involontario di Paul Ricoeur

The approach with which Marion approaches Thomas’s Aquinas theology at the beginning of his phenomenological journey bears the imprint of Heidegger’s critique of onto-theology, but also of his personal hostility to the conceptual idolatry and atheism manifested in Nietzsche’s philosophy. What Marion contrasts with the conceptual idol is the icon and iconic thought. If the idol comes from looking at it, the icon looks at us, calls forth the vision, letting the visible become saturated with the Invisible. According to Marion, conceptual idolatry still seems a dangerous temptation in our times. Metaphysical categories, concepts can function as idols if they are generated by thought as objects appropriate to ‘God’ on the basis of its divine founding function.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53438/XJUW7074

Dialog 55-3 Pitreți

Libre arbitre et déterminisme. Un plaidoyer pour le libertarisme agent-causal

In this article we aim to offer a plea for agent-causal libertarianism. This topic will be addressed in the context of the contemporary debate on free will and determinism. The importance of this millennial philosophical-scientific debate is obvious. If our constitution includes a physical nature, like the other elements of material Universe, then it too appears to be governed by the same physical laws. In this case, if the world is deterministic, “(i) all the laws of nature have this feature—they always specify a unique outcome for a given set of initial conditions—and (ii) everything that happens in the Universe falls under some laws of nature or other” Therefore, if this were the case, it seems that we do not possess the freedom we believe we have when we think that we could have done differently in the past, that our present choices are real, and that the future is still open. Since the world was characterized by certain conditions in the distant past, there seems to be only one way it can be today, tomorrow, and forever. Everything in this world seems to be already established, so that our freedom is, at best, an illusion. The illusion becomes even greater when certain findings in neuroscience seem to confirm it. If that were the case, then the stakes of this debate are ones of the highest possible, because by implication, with the illusion of freedom, everything becomes an illusion. Without freedom of the will, not only moral responsibility (with justice systems, religion etc.) and epistemic responsibility become an illusion, but even rationality itself, with all its deliberative and analytical processes, and with it, the knowledge of truth, the possibility of correcting errors of thought and finally the agent itself. The implications are catastrophic for such a world, since in it there is no room for good and evil, truth and falsehood, wisdom and folly, merit and demerit. With the listing of the implications, of which some are more or less aware, the schism among philosophers and scientists also begins. Our article attempts to provide a plea for agent-causal libertarianism in response to these problems. In doing so, we will first provide a classification of libertarianism in order to frame, define, and distinguish the libertarianism we defend. We will then highlight the incompatibility of agent-causal libertarianism with both determinism and other perspectives that promote event-type causation. Also, to clarify our position and introduce our arguments for the plea, we will compare compatibilism with our perspective. Finally, we will present six arguments in favor of agent-causal libertarianism. In this final section, in the part devoted to the objections to the second argument and the responses to the objections, we will also enter into dialogue with some experiments in neuroscience and experimental studies in the cognitive sciences.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53438/YKUR2511

Dialog 54-4 Topala

Gabriel Hălănduţ: La via dell’uomo oltre le mura. Un’ermeneutica dell’interiorità imposta dal coraggio della libertà

What is human’s right place on this earth? Nonetheless, is there such a place? Through a simple hermeneutic exercise applied to monastic life since the beginnings of the Church, I tried to show in this article that there is no definitive answer to these questions. It is easily affirmed that the life of the spiritual man is rather a continuous path, a continuous dialectical movement between liberation from the cave of shadows, towards the light of an epistemological truth, and the return to the cave of one’s own interiority, where the redeeming Truth resides. It can also be seen how human life cannot be separated according to different fields of study, but that it is a unique whole. Philosophy and theology, reason and faith, are parts of the same path.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53438/ZKPD7690

Dialog 52-2 Halandut

 

 

Fabian Pitreţi: Il processo del bene. Tra l’etica, la morale e la politica nel pensiero di Paul Ricoeur

The contribution of this article aims to offer a synthetic overview of Paul Ricoeur’s thought in the ethical-political field, in particular on the theme of «good». In this sense, starting from the distinction made by the french philosopher between the concepts of “morality” and “ethics” and even more so from his subordination of morality to ethics, we want to try to highlight the relationship that is being established between ethics and morality and between laws and ethical-moral values, therefore how the good should be understood. Therefore, retracing some central paragraphs of the essays if like another and Ethics and morality, we will try to highlight the Ricoeurian perspective on the question of the good and also to offer possible paths of interpretation to understand the process and value of the good.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53438/DCUW6749

Dialog 51-5 Pitreti

 

 

Gabriel Hălănduţ: Il ruolo escatologico del mito. Una lettura di Fedone

The existence of humans on Earth is one of the most researched topics in the whole history of the world. Very often we can see that the solutions proposed by religion, philosophy or literature should consider what is popular at a particular time in history.
However, in this Digital Age, where the virtual reality is becoming an actual reality, we can see how the return to the literature of Antiquity, even to a myth, proves to be a solution when confronted with those deep existential questions regarding the immortality of the soul and the afterlife. In the ‘Phaedo’, Plato is not ashamed to return to the myth that philosophy at the time prided itself on overcoming.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53438/KURJ4023

Dialog 51-3 Halandut

 

 

Fabian Pitreţi: La nozione di identità narrativa in Paul Ricoeur. Una possibile soluzione al dramma della ricerca del sé

The theme of the article concerns the question of identity, in particular the notion of narrative identity discussed by Paul Ricoer in Time and Narrative and in Oneself as Another. The topic, therefore, specifically concerns the field of philosophical anthropology and the philosophy of language with an important reference to the question of narrativity. Briefly, the central question that the article deals with concerns Paul Ricoeur’s intuition between what we are and the story that each of us builds to distill a narrative thread and therefore to give meaning to our lives. In other words, the notion of narrative identity represents a paradigm which, on the one hand, understands and explains the stability of human identity but which also recognizes and gives a theoretical foundation to a change of perspective and interpretation of ourselves; therefore, on what we are and on the world in which we live, an identity and a perception of self no longer idem but always in motion, i.e. ipse, exactly like the narrative thread of a story.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53438/CXUI6751

Dialog 50-6 Pitreti